Why Extemporaneous Speaking Is the Most Transferable Leadership Contest in FFA

Deep Dives on Specific FFA Contests and What They Teach

By FFApresident.com Editorial

Which FFA contest teaches the skills that travel furthest? The honest answer is that nobody has measured it. The title of this article is an argument, not a finding, and it deserves to be tested against the alternatives. This piece lays out the case for extemporaneous speaking as the most transferable leadership contest, the strongest case against and a way for members to decide for themselves. Where FFA has published facts, they are cited. Where this article reasons, it says so.

The Case For

FFA’s event page says members express themselves on a given agriculture-related topic without prior preparation or rehearsal, in limited time, and judges evaluate speaking, presentation, content and the ability to answer questions. Three features support a transferability argument:

FFA’s improv article adds that improvisation can be trained with exercises, which supports the idea that the skill is learnable and so worth building.

The Case Against

Several other contests have equally strong claims, and the sources support each:

There is also a conceptual objection: extemporaneous speaking tests a single person quickly, while many workplaces reward preparation, teamwork and writing. If your target job values careful analysis more than quick talking, another event may transfer better.

How to Decide for Yourself

QuestionWhat it suggests
Will you often speak with little notice?Extemporaneous speaking fits
Will you run or join formal groups?Parliamentary Procedure fits
Are you job hunting soon?Employment Skills fits
Do you want to write, design or produce media?Agricultural Communications fits
Do you want to shape public policy debates?Agricultural Issues Forum fits

The table is this site’s suggestion. FFA’s own advice is to begin with your interests and career aspirations and ask your advisor, as in the Tips for Selecting article.

A Fair Conclusion

Extemporaneous speaking is a strong candidate for the most broadly useful single skill, because quick, organized speaking appears in so many settings. But FFA does not rank contests, no study here measures transfer and the best event for a particular member depends on their goals. The defensible claim is that it is among the most transferable, not that it clearly beats every other.

The related article on extemporaneous speaking as a career skill covers the format and practice routine in more detail.

What Real Evidence Would Look Like

To show that one contest transfers best, someone would need to follow groups of former participants into jobs and compare outcomes, while accounting for the fact that people choose events that suit them. FFA has published no such comparison in the sources cited here. Without it, the most responsible approach is to sample: members can try a different event each season and notice which skills show up in school, work and chapter life. Their own experience is not proof, but it is better evidence for their own decision than any slogan.

Honest Limits

This article is an opinion piece grounded in FFA’s descriptions. The event page does not state time limits or topics, and event formats change. No source cited here compares transfer across contests or tracks participants into careers.

Past presidents on this site whose careers show different kinds of communication include Mark Sanborn, a leadership author and speaker; Jan Eberly, an economist who served as the U.S. Treasury’s chief economist; and Seth Derner, an ag teacher and learning company co-founder. Their bios do not say which contests they entered.

Sources

← All 100 FFA Leadership Articles